Free Essays on The Downfall Of Tsarism

Without Russia’s previous history World War One would not have created such discontent and wouldn’t have led to a revolution during February 1917. World War One highlighted the weakness in the autocratic system and was a contributing factor to the February uprising and thus the fall of the Romanov rule. The impact of the First World War was a key factor in the downfall of Tsarism as it created enormous pressure on the Tsar. However there were also a number of other factors which too helped to destroy the Tsarist state including the fact that Nicholas II was ill suited to the role which he was poorly prepared to face. However Nicholas II’s ability was not in question because he was next in line and whether he was fit for the challenge was not an issue of concern. One of the weaknesses of a hereditary system such as that of Tsarist Russia is that it does not rely on the ability of the person it instead depends upon the line of inheritance. Nicholas II, the last Tsar of Russia was ill-suited to the role of Tsar and hence found the responsibilities it brought challenging and difficult to handle. For generations Russia had ruled by the system of autocracy that is rule by one person as the see fit. Therefore the decision to enter the war was purely a catalyst which helped accelerate the collapse of a system which was beginning to look outdated by the 20th century. The personality of Nicholas II was not however the only factor in the downfall of Tsarism in 1917. The growth of industry and with it new industrial classes both middle and working class exaggerated the division between those citizens with power and those without. The demand for a measure of parliamentary democracy was growing which put the Tsar and his supporters from the landed aristocracy under increasing pressure. However the demand for democracy in the form of a parliament was only growing from a small minority of the middle classes and the liberals who looked at wha... Free Essays on The Downfall Of Tsarism Free Essays on The Downfall Of Tsarism Without Russia’s previous history World War One would not have created such discontent and wouldn’t have led to a revolution during February 1917. World War One highlighted the weakness in the autocratic system and was a contributing factor to the February uprising and thus the fall of the Romanov rule. The impact of the First World War was a key factor in the downfall of Tsarism as it created enormous pressure on the Tsar. However there were also a number of other factors which too helped to destroy the Tsarist state including the fact that Nicholas II was ill suited to the role which he was poorly prepared to face. However Nicholas II’s ability was not in question because he was next in line and whether he was fit for the challenge was not an issue of concern. One of the weaknesses of a hereditary system such as that of Tsarist Russia is that it does not rely on the ability of the person it instead depends upon the line of inheritance. Nicholas II, the last Tsar of Russia was ill-suited to the role of Tsar and hence found the responsibilities it brought challenging and difficult to handle. For generations Russia had ruled by the system of autocracy that is rule by one person as the see fit. Therefore the decision to enter the war was purely a catalyst which helped accelerate the collapse of a system which was beginning to look outdated by the 20th century. The personality of Nicholas II was not however the only factor in the downfall of Tsarism in 1917. The growth of industry and with it new industrial classes both middle and working class exaggerated the division between those citizens with power and those without. The demand for a measure of parliamentary democracy was growing which put the Tsar and his supporters from the landed aristocracy under increasing pressure. However the demand for democracy in the form of a parliament was only growing from a small minority of the middle classes and the liberals who looked at wha...